analysis
Carnegie Mellon University Startup Ecosystem Analysis
This analysis examines 34 startups primarily affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), showcasing the university's vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem. The dataset reveals insights into funding patterns, geographic distribution, and university affiliations across this cohort.
Key Findings
💰 Funding Landscape
The startup ecosystem has collectively raised $125.1M in funding, with significant variance in capital raised:
- Average funding: $3.68M per startup
- Median funding: $1.85M per startup
- Unfunded startups: 7 companies (21%) are currently bootstrapped or pre-funding
The median being significantly lower than the mean indicates a right-skewed distribution — a few highly-funded startups pull the average upward.
🏆 Top Performers
The funding landscape is dominated by a few key players:
- Stratus Materials ($22M) - Leading the pack in total capital raised
- CAMB.AI ($18.5M) - Strong second position
- RoboForce ($15M) - Tied for third
- enerBit ($15M) - Notable as the only Colombian startup in the top tier
- Tacit Therapeutics ($10M) - Affiliated with University of Pittsburgh
🌍 Geographic Distribution
While the USA dominates the ecosystem, there's notable international representation, particularly from Colombia, demonstrating CMU's global reach and influence in entrepreneurship.
🎓 University Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University is the primary source institution, with the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) also represented. This highlights CMU's strength in fostering entrepreneurship, particularly in AI, infrastructure, and deep tech sectors.
The visualizations below provide a comprehensive view of funding patterns, geographic spread, university representation, and the statistical distribution of capital raised across the ecosystem.
Dataset: 34 Startups <class 'pandas.core.frame.DataFrame'> RangeIndex: 34 entries, 0 to 33 Data columns (total 6 columns): # Column Non-Null Count Dtype --- ------ -------------- ----- 0 Number 34 non-null int64 1 Startup 34 non-null object 2 Brief Summary 34 non-null object 3 Raised 34 non-null object 4 Country 34 non-null object 5 University 34 non-null object dtypes: int64(1), object(5) memory usage: 1.7+ KB None ================================================== First few rows:
📈 Data Cleaning & Statistical Analysis
The analysis required addressing data quality issues in the original CSV file, where some rows experienced column shifts during parsing. This was resolved by:
- Detecting misaligned rows where the 'Country' field contained funding values (starting with
$) - Redistributing column values to their correct positions
- Standardizing funding formats by parsing various notations (K, M, dollar signs, commas)
Funding Distribution Insights
The funding distribution reveals several key patterns:
- Concentration at lower tiers: The majority of startups cluster in the $0-5M range
- Long tail distribution: A small number of outliers (5 startups) have raised >$10M
- Mean vs. Median gap: The $1.83M difference between mean ($3.68M) and median ($1.85M) indicates positive skew
- Funding accessibility: 79% of startups have secured at least some funding
Geographic & Institutional Patterns
Country-level analysis shows:
- USA dominates total funding volume
- Colombia emerges as a notable international participant (primarily through enerBit's $15M raise)
- Cross-border collaboration reflects CMU's global network
University affiliation demonstrates CMU's entrepreneurial dominance, with secondary contribution from University of Pittsburgh, particularly in the biotech/therapeutics sector (Tacit Therapeutics).
📊 FUNDING SUMMARY
==================================================
Total startups: 34
Total funding raised: $125.1M
Average funding: $3.68M
Median funding: $1.85M
Startups with $0 raised: 7
🏆 Top 5 Funded Startups:
Startup Raised Country University
Stratus Materials $22M USA CMU
CAMB.AI $18.5M USA CMU
RoboForce $15M USA CMU
enerBit $15M Colombia CMU
Tacit Therapeutics $10M USA Pitt
📍 FUNDING BREAKDOWN BY COUNTRY
============================================================
Total Funding ($M) Avg Funding ($M) Number of Startups
Country
USA 106.04 3.42 31
Colombia 15.00 15.00 1
India 3.80 3.80 1
Denmark 0.25 0.25 1
💡 INSIGHTS
============================================================
Top 5 startups control 64.4% of total funding
Funding concentration indicates high market dominance